KSR v. Teleflex: High Court’s “Obviousness” Ruling No Sea Change in Patent Law

Issues:

Economic and Individual Liberties: Intellectual / Private Property Rights

Download the PDF

By The Honorable Gerald J. Mossinghoff, Senior Counsel at the Alexandria, Virginia law firm Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C.

Related Content

Legal Backgrounders
June 8, 2007

A Patented Court Term: KSR, Microsoft & MedImmune’s Impact On IP And Innovation

By Robert P. Parker, a partner with the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP.

Subscribe

2009 Massachusetts Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20036

© 2026 WLF. All rights reserved.

By visiting our website, you agree to the use of tracking technologies, such as cookies, to improve site functionality, analyze web traffic, and record how you interact with our website.

Leading Legal Scholar John Yoo of UC Berkeley Law Joins WLF’s Legal Policy Advisory Board

FCC v. AT&T; Verizon Communications v. FCC

Growing Exceptions, Shrinking PSLRA Safe Harbor

Legal Backgrounders

KSR v. Teleflex: High Court’s “Obviousness” Ruling No Sea Change in Patent Law

A Patented Court Term: KSR, Microsoft & MedImmune’s Impact On IP And Innovation

Featured

Leading Legal Scholar John Yoo of UC Berkeley Law Joins WLF’s Legal Policy Advisory Board

Featured Case

FCC v. AT&T; Verizon Communications v. FCC

Featured

Growing Exceptions, Shrinking PSLRA Safe Harbor

Legal Backgrounders

KSR v. Teleflex: High Court’s “Obviousness” Ruling No Sea Change in Patent Law

Related Content

A Patented Court Term: KSR, Microsoft & MedImmune’s Impact On IP And Innovation