Joining the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the American Bankers Association, WLF asked the Third Circuit to review an order by a U.S. District Court that certified a class likely containing thousands of uninjured individuals.

This post explains how HRSA’s expansive interpretation of “patient” for the 340B Program illustrates the dangers of agency overreach and why the Supreme Court’s Loper Bright decision correctly ensures that agencies cannot rewrite statutes through regulatory guidance.

Third-party litigation funding is on the rise in the U.S., the UK, and the EU, with legislative, judicial, and regulatory developments requiring business defendants' attention and strategic involvement.

The FTC's return of the phrase "without unduly burdening legitimate business activity" is an encouraging development but only if the Commission embraces that concept in its work.

The research and reports of an international cancer research agency has become heavily influenced by the precautionary principle, resulting in systematic overstatement of carcinogenic hazards.

“War on terror caselaw doesn’t dictate the outcome when a local government compels speech.”—Zac Morgan, WLF Senior Litigation Counsel Click here to read WLF’s brief. (Washington, DC)—Washington Legal Foundation (WLF) today urged the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to reverse a lower court decision that inappropriately relied...

WLF's hot take on the oral arguments before the D.C. Circuit on the Trump executive orders issued against a group of private law firms.