“Administrative agencies cannot serve as prosecutor, judge, and jury to impose punitive penalties without violating the Constitution.”—Cory Andrews, WLF General Counsel & Vice President of Litigation Click here for WLF’s brief. (Washington, DC)— Washington Legal Foundation (WLF) today urged the U.S. Supreme Court to hold that the Federal Communications Commission’s...

Click here to read the brief. (Washington, DC)— Washington Legal Foundation (WLF) today asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn an appeals court decision that would allow activists to impose massive liability on U.S. entities for “aiding and abetting” a third-party’s alleged human rights violations overseas. The plaintiffs, practitioners of...

Taken to its logical conclusion, the PSLRA’s safe harbor is largely mooted by the Ninth Circuit's Funko decision.

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a decision of the Colorado Supreme Court in a climate-change suit by Boulder County against major energy companies.

(Washington, DC)—Today in Learning Resources v. Trump/V.O.S. v. Trump the U.S. Supreme Court struck down tariffs imposed by President Trump. The Court’s decision was a victory for WLF, whose amicus brief argued that the President’s asserted legal authority was specious at best. The Court agreed, rejecting the President’s claim that...

WLF urged the Supreme Court to review a 4th Circuit decision that flouts Federal Rule of Evidence 702’s mandate for judges to ensure expert testimony’s factual reliability.

State and city mandates that businesses contracting with the government implement labor peace agreements are preempted by federal law.