The Fourth Circuit stresses that trial courts must carefully examine the possible disparities among class members' claims when performing Rule 23 predominance and commonality inquiries.

WLF asked the Eleventh Circuit to reverse a $200 million punitive- damages award in a products-liability case against Tesla.

After a needlessly long process, FDA's decision to allow a nicotine-pouch maker to claim a reduced risk of harm on the product merits praise, though mostly for its momentary deviation from hostility to the 1st Amendment.

Businesses will only benefit from the Justice Department's credit for effective compliance programs if the programs reflect lessons from the relevant industry and geographic region.

The First Amendment stands in the way of governments and their contingent-fee counsel’s use of public-nuisance theories to regulate how companies speak about lawful goods, take part in public debate, or exercise editorial discretion.

The plaintiffs' theory that any dose of an artificial substance can cause harm initially succeeded in ethylene oxide litigation, but the tide is turning toward sound science in several state courts reviewing EtO claims.

WLF urged the Federal Communications Commission to grant a petition requesting that it preempt California’s carrier-of-last-resort regime, a rule-set that prevents broadband installation.