The federal Home Rule Act constrains the District of Columbia's attorney general from pursuing consumer-protection-oriented claims against oil companies for alleged climate-change harms.

Courts should cease reliance on a post-9/11 SCOTUS ruling to justify deference to the government's position in First Amendment cases outside of the wartime context.

Regulated businesses affected by federal environmental permit reviews should comment by July 27 on EPA's proposed streamlining of the NEPA process.

WLF's comment letter supports the SEC's proposal to rescind a rule mandating businesses' disclosure of climate-related risks, which would have violated the First Amendment.

The appeals court properly limited an ancient legal doctrine that relieves plaintiffs from the need to provide causational evidence in a case involving airline employee uniforms.

The Fourth Circuit stresses that trial courts must carefully examine the possible disparities among class members' claims when performing Rule 23 predominance and commonality inquiries.

WLF asked the Eleventh Circuit to reverse a $200 million punitive- damages award in a products-liability case against Tesla.