In an amicus brief, WLF urged the D.C. Circuit to affirm four lower court decisions enjoining executive orders that singled out major law firms for selective punishment.

HIGHLIGHTS:8 amicus filings – 2 comments – 3 publications – 1 program NEW FILINGS – AMICUS BRIEFS Barry v. DePuy SynthesWLF urges the Federal Circuit to rehear en banc a decision that reversed exclusion of junk science from a patent infringement trial.[expert evidence] Bounthon v. The Proctor & Gamble Co.WLF...

The decision broadly construed Criminal Procedure Rule 6(e) "matter occurring before" language to protect grand jury documents from Freedom of Information Act disclosure.

Congress should not codify FDA's regulatory overreach on drug ads, but legislators can take positive steps that would protect speech and benefit consumers.

WLF urges the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to rehear and correct a decision that reversed exclusion of junk science from a patent infringement trial.

In the broader context of growing state and federal regulatory efforts, a federal circuit court judge's cautionary concurrence on third-party litigation funding merits significant attention.

WLF asked the Ninth Circuit to affirm a lower court's dismissal of a dubious lawsuit which, if allowed to proceed, would chill effective commercial advocacy for no public gain.