“War on terror caselaw doesn’t dictate the outcome when a local government compels speech.”—Zac Morgan, WLF Senior Litigation Counsel Click here to read WLF’s brief. (Washington, DC)—Washington Legal Foundation (WLF) today urged the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to reverse a lower court decision that inappropriately relied...

WLF's hot take on the oral arguments before the D.C. Circuit on the Trump executive orders issued against a group of private law firms.

Financial services institutions should provide the Treasury Department's FinCEN with public comment on an anti-money laundering proposal that would fundamentally reshape this area of banking law compliance.

The research and reports of an international cancer research agency has become heavily influenced by the precautionary principle, resulting in systematic overstatement of carcinogenic hazards.

WLF asked the Supreme Court to review a Minnesota court's decision to assert jurisdiction over a foreign company for harm caused by misuse of its product.

The 8th Circuit, agreeing with a brief joined by WLF, vacated the FCC's controversial digital discrimination rule in a textbook application of Loper Bright.

On Wednesday, May 6, the California Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Gilead Tenofovir Cases. WLF has participated as an amicus in the case, filing five separate briefs at both the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court levels since 2022. Today, the Wall Street Journal published an op-ed on...