Working Papers

November 20, 2015

Working Papers

Keeping the Jurisdictional Toothpaste in the Tube: “General Jurisdiction by Consent” after Daimler AG v. Bauman

Download the PDF

By James M. Beck, Counsel in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania office of Reed Smith LLP.

Related Content

Legal Backgrounders

June 19, 2015

Does Daimler v. Bauman Portend an End to Madison County’s Reign as a Top “Magnet Jurisdiction”?

By Gary A. Isaac, Counsel in the Chicago office of the law firm Mayer Brown LLP. In pharmaceutical, medical device, and other “mass tort” litigation, plaintiffs’ counsel frequently collect cases to file in certain preferred “magnet” jurisdictions without regard to where the particular plaintiffs’ claims arise. Asbestos litigation is a...

Legal Backgrounders

June 20, 2014

The Other Shoe Drops on General Jurisdiction: Making the Most of Supreme Court’s Bauman & Goodyear Rulings

By James M. Beck, Of Counsel, and Michelle Lyu Cheng, a Senior Associate, both with the law firm Reed Smith LLP in Philadelphia. Doing business in all 50 states no longer subjects a corporation to suit in all 50 states, and International Sho [note]Int’l Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S....

On the Merits

September 13, 2013

ON THE MERITS: DaimlerChrysler AG v. Bauman

Featuring Donald Earl Childress III, associate professor of law at Pepperdine University School of Law; and Matt Wessler, a staff attorney with Public Justice.