City of Cleveland v. Pickett

On January 6, 2026, WLF urged the Supreme Court to grant review and reverse a Sixth Circuit decision that blessed certifying a disparate-impact damages class that included many uninjured members. WLF contends that federal courts lack jurisdiction over claims by class members who suffered no concrete injury. In its amicus brief urging certiorari, WLF argues that certifying classes with uninjured members violates Article III’s standing requirements and encroaches on the Executive’s enforcement powers under Article II. This troubling trend invites abusive class actions that distort markets and stifle innovation.