Ruling Criticizing Prop 65 Is Mixed Blessing For Defendants

Working Papers

April 21, 2006

An Exaggerated And Ill-Conceived Sense Of Risk: The Ephemeral Nature Of California’s Proposition 65

By Thomas H. Clarke, Jr., a senior partner with Ropers, Majeski, Kohn, & Bentley in their San Francisco office.

Legal Backgrounders

December 16, 2005

State Law As Health Hazard: How Prop 65 Undermines National Food Labeling

By Gene Livingston, a Shareholder with the law firm Greenberg Traurig, LLP in its Sacramento office, and Lisa L. Halko, an associate with the firm, also in its Sacramento office. Lisa L. Halko

Legal Backgrounders

November 18, 2005

Would You Like A Prop 65 Warning With Those Fries?

By Ann Grimaldi, a partner with the law firm McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP.

Leading Legal Scholar John Yoo of UC Berkeley Law Joins WLF’s Legal Policy Advisory Board

Montgomery v. Caribe

A Forceful Railroad Regulation Policy Statement on Preemption Serves the Public Interest

Legal Backgrounders

Ruling Criticizing Prop 65 Is Mixed Blessing For Defendants

An Exaggerated And Ill-Conceived Sense Of Risk: The Ephemeral Nature Of California’s Proposition 65

State Law As Health Hazard: How Prop 65 Undermines National Food Labeling

Would You Like A Prop 65 Warning With Those Fries?

Featured

Leading Legal Scholar John Yoo of UC Berkeley Law Joins WLF’s Legal Policy Advisory Board

Featured Case

Montgomery v. Caribe

Featured

A Forceful Railroad Regulation Policy Statement on Preemption Serves the Public Interest

Legal Backgrounders

Ruling Criticizing Prop 65 Is Mixed Blessing For Defendants

Related Content

An Exaggerated And Ill-Conceived Sense Of Risk: The Ephemeral Nature Of California’s Proposition 65

State Law As Health Hazard: How Prop 65 Undermines National Food Labeling

Would You Like A Prop 65 Warning With Those Fries?