Legal Backgrounders

March 24, 2006

Legal Backgrounders

State High Court Condemns Arbitration Provisions That Don’t Allow Class Actions

Download the PDF

By Donald M. Falk, a partner in the Supreme Court and Appellate Practice Group of the law firm Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP, resident in the Palo Alto office and Archis A. Parasharami, an associate in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Related Content

Legal Backgrounders

June 29, 2001

U.S. Supreme Court Gives Employers A Chance To Avoid Costly Litigation

Michael J. Connolly, a member of the Detroit, Michigan office, and Clifford J. Scharman, a member of the Washington, D.C. office of Riley Roumell & Connolly, P.C.

Legal Backgrounders

November 17, 2000

California High Court Lays Out Mandatory Arbitration Guidelines

By William J. Emanuel, a partner, and Harry I. Johnson, III, an associate, in the Los Angeles office of the law firm Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue.

Legal Backgrounders

November 13, 1998

Employment Dispute Arbitration: An Antidote To Frivolous Litigation

By Paul W. Cane, Jr., a partner, and E. Jeffrey Grube, an associate, with the San Francisco law firm Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP.