Welcome to the Washington Legal Foundation

Case Detail


United States v. Arizona
On September 2, 2010, WLF filed a brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, urging it to reject the Obama Administration’s challenge to the new Arizona law that cracks down on illegal aliens. WLF argued that the Arizona statute (known as SB 1070) does not conflict with federal law but rather is a well-designed effort to provide enforcement assistance to federal immigration officials. WLF filed its brief on behalf of seven clients, including four Members of the U.S. House of Representatives: Dan Burton, Lynn Jenkins, Tom McClintock, and Jerry Moran. WLF’s brief focused on Section 5 of SB 1070, which makes it a misdemeanor for anyone to solicit or perform employment if (s)he is not legally present in the country. Disputing the U.S.’s contention that § 5 conflicts with federal immigration law, WLF argued there could be no conflict because both laws place a priority on eliminating all employment of illegal aliens.
Case Status:
Oral argument set for the first week of November, 2010. Awaiting decision.
More Information and Downloads:
7/20/2010: Download the Brief
9/2/2010: Download the Brief
Press Release: WLF Represents Sponsor of Arizona Immigration Law in Defending Law Against Federal Challenge
Litigation Update: Federal District Court Strikes Down All Major Provisions Of Arizona Immigration Law
Press Release: Court Urged to Reject U.S. Challenge To Arizona Immigration Law