Case Detail

San Remo Hotel v. City and County of San Francisco
On March 4, 2002, the California Supreme Court rejected arguments by WLF that a government regulation requiring hotel owners to pay exaction fees to ease the shortage of low-income housing in San Francisco constituted a taking of private property requiring just compensation. On April 11, 2001, WLF filed a brief with the California Supreme Court, arguing that the Constitution's Takings Clause obligates San Francisco to compensate a hotel owner for a $500,000 exaction the city imposed when it required hotel owners to pay for the "privilege" of renting a greater portion of its rooms to tourists than it rented out in 1979.
Case Status:
More Information and Downloads:
4/11/2001: Download the Brief

  • Welcome to the Washington Legal Foundation
  • 2009 Massachusetts Ave., NW
    Washington, DC 20036
  • info@wlf.org  |  ph. 202-588-0302
    ©2018 WLF All Rights Reserved